case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview

case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview

Blog Article

9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to your offender and also the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

Some pluralist systems, for instance Scots law in Scotland and types of civil legislation jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, never exactly match into the dual common-civil legislation system classifications. These types of systems may have been greatly influenced via the Anglo-American common law tradition; however, their substantive law is firmly rooted from the civil law tradition.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the figured out counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession with the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this factor for interim custody of the topic premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more

13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some size, both parties have agreed for the disposal of the instant petition on the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner along with private respondents and will get care of each of the elements of the case and make sure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of your Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

All executive and judicial authorities get more info throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in assist from the Supreme Court, making certain the enforcement of its judgments. Because the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been reached, the decision of your Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. Read more

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it is practical for just a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation for making an attempt to dispose of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got achieved into a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it's arrived at this sort of stage. Read more

The DCFS social worker in charge from the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her six-month report for the court, the worker elaborated around the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.

Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to both party and also the case shall be decided with the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more

Any court may well seek out to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.

Normally, only an appeal accepted through the court of very last vacation resort will resolve these differences and, for many reasons, these types of appeals tend to be not granted.

The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, aside from most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $two hundred. Furthermore, it regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it's issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.